![]() ![]() This methodology study aimed to provide a step-by-step approach mainly for beginners and junior researchers, in the field of tropical medicine and other health care fields, on how to properly and succinctly conduct a SR/MA all the steps here depicts our experience and expertise combined with the already well known and accepted international guidance.ĭetailed steps for conducting any systematic review and meta-analysis 1) which illustrates a detailed and step-by-step the stages for SR/MA studies. To solve those hindrances, we recommend a flow diagram (Fig. It is not easy to be done as there are obstacles that could face the researcher. There are many troubles that a researcher could be struggled with which has no detailed indication.Ĭonducting a SR/MA in tropical medicine and health may be difficult especially for young researchers therefore, understanding of its essential steps is crucial. However, those simple steps are not easy to be reached in reality. ![]() Furthermore, despite the increasing guidelines for effectively conducting a systematic review, we found that basic steps often start from framing question, then identifying relevant work which consists of criteria development and search for articles, appraise the quality of included studies, summarize the evidence, and interpret the results. A systematic review, on the other hand, is defined as a review using a systematic method to summarize evidence on questions with a detailed and comprehensive plan of study. Therefore, a well-conducted SR/MA is considered a feasible solution in keeping health clinicians ahead regarding contemporary evidence-based medicine.ĭiffering from a systematic review, unsystematic narrative review tends to be descriptive, in which the authors select frequently articles based on their point of view which leads to its poor quality. ![]() Systematic review and meta-analyses (SR/MAs) have a high level of evidence as represented by the evidence-based pyramid. However, available studies are often heterogeneous with regard to their design, operational quality, and subjects under study and may handle the research question in a different way, which adds to the complexity of evidence and conclusion synthesis. This massive abundance of literature makes clinical medicine increasingly complex, and knowledge from various researches is often needed to inform a particular clinical decision. The amount of studies published in the biomedical literature, especially tropical medicine and health, has increased strikingly over the last few decades. #We used comprehensive meta analysis for manualSR/MA steps include the development of research question, forming criteria, search strategy, searching databases, protocol registration, title, abstract, full-text screening, manual searching, extracting data, quality assessment, data checking, statistical analysis, double data checking, and manuscript writing. We suggest that all steps of SR/MA should be done independently by 2–3 reviewers’ discussion, to ensure data quality and accuracy. ![]() To solve those hindrances, this methodology study aimed to provide a step-by-step approach mainly for beginners and junior researchers, in the field of tropical medicine and other health care fields, on how to properly conduct a SR/MA, in which all the steps here depicts our experience and expertise combined with the already well-known and accepted international guidance. Understanding of SR/MA steps is of paramount importance for its conduction. In the field of tropical medicine and health, a well-conducted systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) is considered a feasible solution for keeping clinicians abreast of current evidence-based medicine. The massive abundance of studies relating to tropical medicine and health has increased strikingly over the last few decades. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |